Barrister’s Wife Awarded Lump Sum 25 Years After Divorce
by Katy Murcutt - Paralegal
01 April 2010, filed under Divorce
The ex-wife of a successful barrister was awarded a lump sum of £215,000 yesterday, twenty-five years after the couple divorced.
Ex-wife Philippa Vaughan successfully disputed her divorce rights by arguing that she had incurred undue hardship after her annual maintenance payments of £27,175 ceased when David Vaughan QC retired last year. David Vaughan had paid maintenance to his ex-wife each year since 1991 after their divorce in 1985 and had requested permission from the High Court to cease the payments upon his retirement.
The Court of Appeal ruled that Philippa Vaughan, who does not earn an independent income, should instead receive a lump sum. The ex-wife requested that all assets to be taken into account, including a pension scheme Mr Vaughan had put in place with his second wife.
Nicholas Mostyn QC, representing David Vaughan, stated that the impact of all assets being taken into consideration for payment of the lump sum was unreasonable and would be equal to the second wife contributing towards the maintenance of first wife.
Lord Justice Wilson of the Family Division stated that Philippa Vaughan would have been unable to adjust to the termination of the maintenance payments without hardship due to the abrupt manner in which the payments ceased. Further to this, Lord Justice Wilson said that, in his opinion, the judge should not have assumed that half of the pension income belonged to the second wife as, although the second wife has contributed greatly to and maintained the pension fund, the fund was set up during the course of the marriage to first wife, Phillippa Vaughan.
After the hearing, Philippa Vaughan stated that the maintenance order had provided her with a vital income for life.
The court found that it was unreasonable for Mr Vaughan to set aside the maintenance order and cease all payments to his first wife on the basis he no longer wished to pay upon his retirement. Philippa Vaughan had originally claimed for a lump sum divorce settlement of £560,000 from her ex-husband, which was then reduced to just over £340,000. Her final reward of £215,000 will be paid by the end of July this year.
Legal News
-
The Office of Fair Trading could prevent many debt management organisations from using social media sites
11 September 2011
by Alex Wright - Legal Associate
Many debt management organisations will be stopped from getting in contact with consumers through... -
Student charge with alleged computer hacking, police have confirmed
05 September 2011
by Katy Murcutt - Paralegal
An English student has been charged for his alleged involvement in hacking a computer the Met... -
Advertising watchdogs have revealed that certain discount voucher codes have been misleading
27 August 2011
by Katy Murcutt - Paralegal
The advertising watchdog in the UK has said to have resolved more than 50 individual cases which...


Comments to “Barrister’s Wife Awarded Lump Sum 25 Years After Divorce”
3rd May 2012 4:42
Cheap NBA Shoes says:
The key to communication is to hear the content did not say.
11th May 2012 9:40
Coach Factory says:
I am so glad this internet thing works and your article really helped me.Might take you up on that home advice you!At same time,you can visit my website: http://www.coachfactoryonline-us.net
16th May 2012 9:47
cheap coach handbags says:
The prosecution stated that the woman, named Tasneem, would feel very uncomfortable without wearing the full veil which could dramatically alter the level of evidence she provides to the court during the trial.
16th May 2012 9:59
Coach Factory Outlet says:
Advertising which is misleading is strictly prohibited under the rules for the UK advertising. And the rules which govern the printed adverts are clearly laid out in the Code of Non broadcast Advertising in the UK, Sales Promotion and Direct
16th May 2012 10:21
Coach Outlet says:
The guide has also mentioned that photographs can give away car number plates or personal home addresses.
16th May 2012 10:29
Coach Outlet says:
Buy, sell, maintain, pay taxes on mortgage or other property
16th May 2012 11:16
Coach Outlet Online says:
Common matters to which authority is limited include:
16th May 2012 11:16
Coach Outlet says:
This means that you can grant a general power to act in all matters or the power can be limited. Common matters to which authority is limited include:
16th May 2012 11:24
Coach Factory says:
This means that you can grant a general power to act in all matters or the power can be limited. Common matters to which authority is limited include:
16th May 2012 11:32
Coach Outlet Online says:
by a witness who needs to also add their signature. Our Ordinary power of Attorney is simple and easy to complete.
No Comments have been posted yet.